Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘computers’

Lately lots of people have been talking about Pinterest, another new form of social media and on-line interaction.  Pinterest allows participants to explore and develop their interests in different topics — food, home decorating, body art, and the like — by “pinning” news articles, pictures, video, and other items to their “pinboard” for other people to see and comment upon.  Family members and friends have used Pinterest to plan weddings and vacations, share their views on books and TV shows, and find special articles of clothing.

photo-95My Pinterest friends sound like they become almost obsessed with browsing other people’s “pinboards” and filling up their own with interesting and exciting content that reflects well on them.  Similarly, we’ve all got friends who spend a lot of time posting things to Facebook, or blogging (guilty as charged), or playing fantasy sports, or doing the countless other social networking activities you can do on-line.  This shouldn’t be surprising; the internet is a constantly changing, interesting environment that puts the whole world at your fingertips and allows for all kinds of communication.  All of these nifty on-line interaction websites also can allow you to reconnect with high school and college classmates and faraway friends and keep track of how they are doing.  But when does the attraction of the internet pull your home life out of balance, leaving you tapping out a Facebook message or chuckling at a YouTube video while your spouse or girlfriend or children or friends sit idle for hours?  How do you strike a workable real life-virtual life balance?

People have always engaged in solitary activities, like reading a book or playing a musical instrument or jogging, but obsession with on-line activities seems to have special risks.  Studies suggest that people who spend lots of time on-line often struggle with depression and sleep disorders and tend to neglect their need for physical activity and in-person social interaction.  And, of course, the on-line world, with its anonymity and ability to create weird, fake relationships such as the one that has humiliated Notre Dame linebacker Manti Te’o, involves all kinds of potential personal, financial, and criminal hazards that would never be presented by reading a library book or knitting on the sofa while your spouse watches a basketball game on TV.

We all need to figure out when to step away from the computer.

Read Full Post »

Some countries are pushing a proposal to give the U.N.International Telecommunication Union (“ITU”) more control over the internet.  The proposal will receive a hearing in the U.S. House of Representatives next week.

Currently the internt is “governed” (if you can call it that) by a a collection of non-profit entities.  The result has been a lot of freedom and not much regulation.  Governments, however, are concerned that they don’t have sufficient control over this massive, still developing communications medium.  The U.N. proposal, backed by governments in China, Russia, Brazil, India, and other countries, would give the ITU more authority over cybersecurity, data privacy, technical standards and the Web’s address system.

This is such an awful idea that there appears to be bipartisan opposition to it in Washington, D.C., with both the Obama Administration and both Republican and Democratic lawmakers expressing opposition.  Imagine — a proposal that is so obviously terrible that our splintered representatives can agree that it sucks!

And, it does suck.  The last I checked, the internet wasn’t broken.  We can write what we want, and read what we want, without concern that some ponderous and corrupt U.N. regulatory body will try to stop or direct us.  Indeed, the internet is one of the few international activities where cooperation has managed to produce tremendous growth — economic growth, growth in access to information, growth in communications, and growth in freedom.  That’s why repressive governments hate the internet.  Why would we want to hand repressive regimes a tool they can use to silence critics and punish dissidents?  Let’s all hope Congress does the right thing and tells the U.N. to keep their hands off the internet.

Read Full Post »

After a few weeks of trying to make do with just Richard’s old laptop, I broke down today and bought a new iMac.  I was just afraid that Richard’s laptop, which already has no battery power and is somewhat battered, was going to break down.  Given that computers have become my main informational resource, I thought we just couldn’t do without one.

I’m enjoying the wireless keyboard and the magic mouse, which are big improvements in my book.  The screen is a bit bigger, which is nice for my aging eyeballs.  There are some weird new icons on the desktop, though, and I can’t yet figure out how to access the stuff that was on the hard drive of our old computer.  That will just have to be a new project.

There’s a kind of “getting to know you” period when you get a new computer, even if it is just a newer model of the kind of computer you had before.  (In our case, a much newer model.)  It’s like getting a new car.  For a while you have to figure out where the windshield wipers are, and how to program the radio to your favorite stations.  The things fall into place and the car, or the computer, become as familiar and comfortable as an old shoe.

Read Full Post »

Yesterday, I got the bad news that I feared — the resolute iMac, faithful blogging friend and desktop companion, has permanently given up the ghost.

Earlier this week the iMac screen went opaque.  I turned it off, hoping it was just a rebooting issue, but I couldn’t turn it back on.  Yesterday I took it to the Apple store and the blue-shirted folks at the Genius Bar opened it up.  It was weird seeing the iMac with its innards exposed — like being present in the operating room when a family member is getting an appendix removed.

The Geniuses took one look, saw that the capacitors were blown out, and advised, with appropriate respect and regret, that nothing could be done.  Our iMac is so old — or, as one of the Apple Geniuses said, “vintage” — that they don’t even make replacement capacitors for it anymore.  We removed the hard drive so that I can try to retrieve stuff from our iPhoto and iTunes folders, closed it up, and I carefully carried it back to the car.

The demise of the iMac leaves a physical void on the desktop in our study, and I think wistfully of its 8+ years of steady reliability and service.  But life goes on.  I’d welcome any suggestions from readers about Apple desktops that can fill the void and try to fill the big shoes left by the iMac.

Read Full Post »

Lately I’ve noticed that more and more attorneys at our firm seem to have two monitors for their computers.  When you walk past their offices you do a double-take.  (Bad pun alert!)

Why would attorneys need two monitors for their computers?  I’m not sure.  If you ask them, they give you some song-and-dance about how the extra monitor makes it easier for them to work with spreadsheets, or review  documents, or perform some other important function.  I’m guessing, however, that their decision to add a monitor was motivated, at least in part, by their belief that it will make their office cooler.  And for the most part, it does!  Working with that second screen makes them look hip and sharp, like Tom Cruise in Minority Report.

There is a risk in this, of course.  The number of monitors on office desks could become a competition that rapidly escalates out of control, like the arms race or the size of fins on American cars in the ’50s.  If two monitors looks rad, what would three look like, or four?  Soon offices could be like the Taxi episode where the Reverend Jim becomes motivated for a mysterious reason, works like a dog, and the other characters ultimately learn that he was saving all his money to erect an entire wall of TV sets.

And there’s a limit to what adding computer hardware can accomplish.  As the photo accompanying this article indicates, not everyone with extra monitors will necessarily look cool.

Read Full Post »

Yesterday our computer system at work was painfully slow — so slow, in fact, that everything I tried to do was greeted by the dreaded spinning circle.  If you work on a network, you’ve probably experienced it at some point.  You’ve tried to save a document or move from email to Word when, instead of instantaneous responsiveness to your keystroke or mouse click, you see the circle with the light moving around the edge.

The circle is supposed to reassure you that the system is diligently working on the command you have sent.  Instead, it immediately plunges every white collar worker into the blackest pits of despair, because you know that you are likely well and truly screwed.  You realize that the spinning circle means you have probably lost what you were working on.  And then, after a few seconds, the circle simply serves as a colossal unending annoyance.  You can’t help but repeatedly pound the return key with increasing force in hopes of somehow getting the damn circle off the screen before it causes you to become cross-eyed.

On our system at work, the circle replaced the tumbling hour glass as the “looks like there’s a problem” icon.  As between the two, I prefer the tumbling hourglass, but in reality neither the circle nor the hourglass adequately communicates the awful import of a frozen computer.  Why not a depiction of vultures alighting on their perch, or a laughing, taunting death’s head instead?

Read Full Post »

UJ — no doubt one of the last holdouts in this great land of ours — has finally broken down and purchased his own home computer.  And he has jumped in with both feet, too.  Today he bought a MacBookPro, which is the same studly Gen Y laptop that Richard and Russell use.  I’m proud of my thoroughly modern brother!

As I sit here listening to music, drinking a glass of wine, and tapping away at my keyboard, it’s hard for me to imagine what life would be like without a home computer.  For years now, UJ has been faithfully going to the library and using the bank of computers whenever he wants to do research or post to the family blog.

So now UJ will be liberated.  He will be able to post or surf the internet whenever he wants, unshackled by the constraints of library hours, at any time of the day or night.  Watch for his first posting using the MacBookPro.  It will mark the end of an era, and a new beginning.

Read Full Post »

We’ve had our home iMac for six years, and during that long period (too long, according to Richard) it has served faithfully and well.  Lately, however, it has been a bit slower than normal, and somewhat balky.  I asked Richard to take a look at it, and he found that in six years we had managed to use up a lot of space, which could be slowing the iMac down.  He deleted a few programs for old games, but also pointed out that by far the biggest user of space was our iTunes.  It would be a good thing, he said, to go through it and see whether any of the music could be deleted.

It’s amazing what kind of stuff you accumulate on a home computer over the years, and iTunes is no exception.  We had some 93 GB of music on the iTunes, and as I began deleting I found that it was pretty easy to do so.  How did Britney Spears and Jessica Simpson get on there, anyway?  (How embarrassing!)  I don’t think I’ll need, for now at least, the Arabic language primer that I downloaded when we were preparing for our trip to Egypt.  And — sorry, Russell! — I don’t have any problem deleting the heavy metal, electronica, and hip hop/rap music that I don’t like and don’t listen to. The main purpose of the iTunes, now, is to store songs and sync my iPod, so we don’t need to keep music that is never going to make the iPod cut.

So far I’ve deleted about 25 GB of files that were on the iTunes.  We’ll have to see whether the iMac becomes a bit more frisky as a result — but in any event it feels good to discard some of the outmoded musical baggage and cull the iMac herd.

Read Full Post »

The volume of global spam has fallen precipitously in recent months.  According to the security firm Symantec, the volume of spam has fallen from more than 200 billion spam emails per day in August to “only” 50 billion spam emails per day in December.  Of course, 50 billion bits of spam is still 50 billion bits too many.  Still, it is nice to see the numbers drop.  Spam is a good example of how louts can take advantage of a great idea like email and ruin it for everyone.

Experts are wondering what the cause of the drop in spam volume might be and are speculating about whether the decline is permanent.  They wonder if the big-time spammers have stopped because they’ve been arrested, or if regulations have made spamming too difficult and risky, or if the “botnets” that send a lot of the spam have been disabled somehow, or whether spammers are turning to some new campaign.  The reality is, nobody knows.

I wonder if the answer isn’t simpler:  the market is so saturated that spamming just isn’t economical anymore.  After all, is it possible that any red-blooded male hasn’t heard about Viagra or the various options for lengthening and thickening body parts?  Could any person with a computer not be aware of the many simple, no-pain ways of losing weight or quitting smoking, or the satisfying miracle of electronic cigarettes?

According to the “invisible hand” theory of market economics, when supply vastly outstrips demand economic forces will work to bring supply and demand into some kind of equilibrium.  In this instance, the invisible hand may have stopped using the mouse to click on those intriguing “male enhancement” options, and spammers have been forced to look for other lines of work as a result.

Read Full Post »

There appears to be no end to the ingenuity of scammers, spammers, and computer tricksters.  After the tales of woe from the likes of Ethiopian bankers and Hong Kong divorcees get long in the tooth, the scammers try something different.  There’s nothing newsworthy about new computer schemes . . . unless they have an implicit social commentary message.

So it is with the news stories about a scam that tries to trick Facebook users into installing a “dislike” button to accompany the “like” button on their Facebook page.  If the hapless users do so, the scam puts some false application on their Facebook page that then sends out spam.

What’s interesting about this is that, in the abstract, virtual, touchy-feely world of Facebook “friends,” users would want to have a Facebook application to affirmatively indicate their “dislike” for something.  What’s next?  A rogue application that offers Facebook users the opportunity to refer to themselves in the first person?  A phony program that claims to allow Facebook users to send targeted, anonymous computer viruses to try to discourage further Facebook use by people, like their Mom or Aunt Sue, whom they really don’t want to “friend” but can’t turn down without experiencing massive pangs of guilt?  Facebook users may well have untapped reservoirs of rage, ready to be exploited by the next generation of creative scammers.

Read Full Post »

We’ve been at the Sawmill Creek Lodge in Huron, Ohio the past few days for the Webner family reunion.  Although Sawmill Creek has many fine amenities, it does not have in-room wireless connections, and therefore Kish and I can’t use our own laptops to access the internet.  As a result, we have made liberal use of the business center and its PCs.  Frankly, they are a bit slow compared to our Apples.  We find ourselves drumming our fingers on the tabletops as the seconds drag past, seemingly eternal in their duration, and the computer labors to make the necessary connections.  How frustrating!

Of course, it was only a decade or so ago that we were thrilled to have dial-up connections to the internet and to hear that weird boinging sound when the connection was made.  Then, when the internet was new and the novelty of so much information at our fingertips had not worn off, we were happy with downloads that took a minute or two.  With each new computer and internet service provider, however, the speed of connection and the size of the data stream has improved, and now a wait of more than a few seconds to fly to a new web address is just intolerable.

I suppose we should be a bit more patient in modern America.  After all, what’s a few seconds?  Why should a very brief delay be so bothersome?  All I know is:  it is irksome.  It will be nice to get back home to the iMac and to be able once again to rocket around the internet at the accustomed astonishing speeds.

Read Full Post »

Dr. Henry Edward Roberts — called by some “the father of the personal computer” — died recently.  Roberts was a tinkerer who invented the Altair 8800, a personal computer that could be assembled at home.   The build-it-yourself kit sold for $395 and was featured on the front cover of Popular Electronics in 1975.  That article was read by Bill Gates and Paul Allen, computer buffs who decided to call Dr. Roberts and offer to write software for the device.  They later moved to Albuquerque, New Mexico, where Roberts’ company existed, and formed what was then called “Micro-Soft” to sell the software.  The rest, as they say, is history.

The BBC article linked above is interesting in that it features positive comments about Dr. Roberts and his significant impact on the development of the personal computer by Gates and Allen as well as by Steve Wozniak of Apple.  If Microsoft and Apple agree on something dealing with computers, it must be significant — and clearly Dr. Roberts and his tinkerer’s device were.  As we sit in the comfort of our homes, tapping away at our keyboards and using our personal computers for all manner of things, we should all give a nod to Dr. Henry Edward Roberts and his contribution.

Read Full Post »

Our large home computer — the faithful, yet aging, iMac — went on the fritz about three weeks ago.  It was a devastating development.  All of our photos are on the iMac.  All of my iTunes are on the iMac.  My iPod is synced to the iMac, and therefore I couldn’t load new holiday songs.  Blogging continued, fitfully, through use of an old laptop, but it wasn’t as easy as it would using the wide, responsive iMac keyboard.  It made me realize how much of our lives and conveniences are tied up into one computer unit.

The problem with the iMac was one of those annoying, frustrating computer issues.  The unit would turn on but never engage.  Instead, you would see the Apple logo and a ceaselessly spinning wheel.  After starting and restarting, plugging and unplugging, tinkering with power supplies, and whispering fervent but unanswered prayers to the capricious technology gods, we finally broke down and took the iMac to the nearby Apple store.  They promptly and happily fixed the problem, and now the iMac is back in its rightful place on the desktop, ready to provide crucial services in the Webner household.

Tonight, at least, all is right with the world.

Read Full Post »

Today is being celebrated as the 40th birthday of the internet.  Forty years ago today an intrepid team of researchers at UCLA succeeded in getting one of their computers to “talk” to a distant computer — which promptly crashed after the first two letters of a three-letter word were transmitted.  Obviously, the internet has come a long way in 40 years, to the point where pointless blather like the Webnerhouse blog can be easily prepared and made available to any bored internet traveller, anywhere in the world, who might be inclined to visit and see what we have to say.

Coincidentally, this year also is the 40th year of the first Apollo program lunar landing.  Although the internet has progressed tremendously during that 40-year period — going from a clumsy method that crashed before even a single word was transmitted to a communications medium that is found in millions of households and allows for instantaneous access to undreamed off amounts of information — the same cannot be said for the space program.  Indeed, one could argue that manned space exploration has regressed as far and as quickly as the internet has progressed during that same 40-year span.

Since the Apollo program has ended, there has been no serious manned space exploration, and none is on the horizon for the foreseeable future.  Imagine for a moment, however, what might be the reality if manned space exploration had progressed to the same extent as the internet has progressed in the 40 years since 1969.  Where would humans find themselves?  Living in Martian colonies?  Conducting mining operations on Titan?  Aboard spacecraft visiting Alpha Centauri, or the nearest solar system with planets deemed capable of supporting life?

The mind reels at our missed opportunity.

Read Full Post »

When I was in college, my roommate Graydon and I often referred to someone who behaved inappropriately as a “hack,” or to an ill-advised decision as a “hack move.”  I thought about that phrase when I read the latest story about computer hackers, this time in connection with hacking efforts directed against Twitter and Facebook.  The hackers mounted “denial of service” attacks that were simply designed to disrupt access to those popular websites.

I don’t quite get why hackers engage in such hack behavior.  Some hacking is clearly self-interested criminal activity — like that involved in stealing personal information to accomplish identity theft or credit card fraud — but most hacking seems to be mindless vandalism, akin to spray-painted graffiti on park walls, smashed streetlights, and broken glass bottles on sidewalks.  I suppose every vandal gets some kind of thrill from engaging in petty criminal behavior without being caught.  Maybe there also is a fleeting feeling of power in destroying something, or a sense of revenge against society by an outcast, or the ability to boast of an illicit act to the limited circle the hacker is trying to impress.  In any case, it seems like a computer hacker would have to be an unhappy person.  Why else would anyone want to do something that achieves no purpose other than to prevent people from using a website that they think is a lot of fun?

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,099 other followers